<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Before You Start Podcasting, Read This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vidya</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-19270</link>
		<dc:creator>vidya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-19270</guid>
		<description>of course podcasting is rocking up....but i do believe that always things that are perceived through sight capture our memory more than that through sound waves....its just an opinion anyways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course podcasting is rocking up&#8230;.but i do believe that always things that are perceived through sight capture our memory more than that through sound waves&#8230;.its just an opinion anyways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NMax</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>NMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>i think that podcasting can be both negative and positive. there are postive factors such as you being in control, but there are also negative factors such as you can get amateurs doing what they want, which can ruin the experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that podcasting can be both negative and positive. there are postive factors such as you being in control, but there are also negative factors such as you can get amateurs doing what they want, which can ruin the experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayo</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 07:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Ansel, I agree on both points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ansel, I agree on both points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ansel&#8217;s Brain  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Podcasting discussion</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ansel&#8217;s Brain  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Podcasting discussion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 07:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>[...] 	&#171; Hello world! 			 		 	 		 			Podcasting discussion 	 			 					Christian has a good article on podcasting over at his blog.  (And I have some good comments!)  Christian points out that a lot of  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 	&laquo; Hello world! 			 		 	 		 			Podcasting discussion 	 			 					Christian has a good article on podcasting over at his blog.  (And I have some good comments!)  Christian points out that a lot of  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ansel</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Ansel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 07:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>It's the same reason there's a word for "blogging"... you could have posted whatever you wanted on the web long before anyone coined the word "blog" - blogs just removed (most of) the pain from the process.  The same is true of podcasting, and I think that makes it equally word-worthy.  (It also sounds equally silly, but that's another topic for another day...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the same reason there&#8217;s a word for &#8220;blogging&#8221;&#8230; you could have posted whatever you wanted on the web long before anyone coined the word &#8220;blog&#8221; - blogs just removed (most of) the pain from the process.  The same is true of podcasting, and I think that makes it equally word-worthy.  (It also sounds equally silly, but that&#8217;s another topic for another day&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayo</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 07:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>I agree there are good applications for 'podcasting', and if done right, it can make for beautiful stuff. What i want to know is why there had to be a new fancy name for a medium that predates the web by decades. All podcasting really is, is putting a radioshow in mp3format on the web (that's right, not even live).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree there are good applications for &#8216;podcasting&#8217;, and if done right, it can make for beautiful stuff. What i want to know is why there had to be a new fancy name for a medium that predates the web by decades. All podcasting really is, is putting a radioshow in mp3format on the web (that&#8217;s right, not even live).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ansel</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ansel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 06:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>I find the best podcasts are actually quite similar to radio shows: interviews, panel discussions, etc. - content that is more interactive make more sense to present in audio.  The worst podcasts are those where some guy is just reading text off a screen.  The obvious question: why not keep it on the screen in the first place?

One cool application (at least for law geeks like me) is the &lt;a href="http://www.oyez.org/podcast/"&gt;podcasting of court hearings&lt;/a&gt; - a lot can be lost when these are flattened into plain text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the best podcasts are actually quite similar to radio shows: interviews, panel discussions, etc. - content that is more interactive make more sense to present in audio.  The worst podcasts are those where some guy is just reading text off a screen.  The obvious question: why not keep it on the screen in the first place?</p>
<p>One cool application (at least for law geeks like me) is the <a href="http://www.oyez.org/podcast/">podcasting of court hearings</a> - a lot can be lost when these are flattened into plain text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 23:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>I'm happy to see the floodgates open to be honest.  It doesn't concern me if thousands of people want to try their hand at podcasting.  Just like with blogging, the pool of content will be grow constantly and allow us to communicate in a more decentralized way.

What I'd rather not see is podcasting being used for content that would be better suited as simple text on a page.  Content in audio form is less accessible and certainly less searchable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to see the floodgates open to be honest.  It doesn&#8217;t concern me if thousands of people want to try their hand at podcasting.  Just like with blogging, the pool of content will be grow constantly and allow us to communicate in a more decentralized way.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d rather not see is podcasting being used for content that would be better suited as simple text on a page.  Content in audio form is less accessible and certainly less searchable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayo</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/before-podcasting/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=350#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>I work at a local radio station and can confirm there are a lot of people on the airwaves that are completely talentless, and wouldnt recognise good radio when it slapped a trout across their face. Thankfully, this really bad group only got their chance in local radio. I fear podcasting, like weblog software, is opening the floodgates of truly horrible products that noone actually wants. And that's not even considering the usability/accessibility drawbacks.

But that's just the cynic in me talking :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at a local radio station and can confirm there are a lot of people on the airwaves that are completely talentless, and wouldnt recognise good radio when it slapped a trout across their face. Thankfully, this really bad group only got their chance in local radio. I fear podcasting, like weblog software, is opening the floodgates of truly horrible products that noone actually wants. And that&#8217;s not even considering the usability/accessibility drawbacks.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just the cynic in me talking <img src='http://obviousdiversion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
