<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Google Images Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/google-images-doesnt-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/google-images-doesnt-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: marian</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/google-images-doesnt-work/#comment-63613</link>
		<dc:creator>marian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=100#comment-63613</guid>
		<description>none of my 500 images (pattern images) are searched by google, they are named appropriately i believe, but burried in the php workings of a zen cart business program.  should i just create html pages with these images in a separate folder that google can see? and how would i do that,  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>none of my 500 images (pattern images) are searched by google, they are named appropriately i believe, but burried in the php workings of a zen cart business program.  should i just create html pages with these images in a separate folder that google can see? and how would i do that,  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impulstanz reviews</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/google-images-doesnt-work/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Impulstanz reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=100#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update. I suppose the biggest problem now is long lag between spidering and cataloging. My older images turn up all the time but the fresher stuff not at all.

One of the things I am running into is that a lot of my images I store offsite in larger format on account of the Typepad account storage limits (recently much improved). I have no idea how that will affect google's image service (the jpg file and the html are on two different servers).

I'll let you know in a few months or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update. I suppose the biggest problem now is long lag between spidering and cataloging. My older images turn up all the time but the fresher stuff not at all.</p>
<p>One of the things I am running into is that a lot of my images I store offsite in larger format on account of the Typepad account storage limits (recently much improved). I have no idea how that will affect google&#8217;s image service (the jpg file and the html are on two different servers).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you know in a few months or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/google-images-doesnt-work/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 04:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=100#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>If anything, the shorthand guide is to name your files appropriately (using dashes or underscores for filenames with multiple words) and make sure you include alt text that makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, the shorthand guide is to name your files appropriately (using dashes or underscores for filenames with multiple words) and make sure you include alt text that makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impulstanz reviews</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/info-design/google-images-doesnt-work/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Impulstanz reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=100#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Nothing seems to have changed in a coherent way. The spider is very slow to turn up (site indexed same day in google, images who knows when). Having the name of the subject in the image name doesn't necessarily give good results either.

A search for sanchis brought up an image labelled s2.jpg.

Confusing. If you have more recent intelligence on how to optimise for google images, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing seems to have changed in a coherent way. The spider is very slow to turn up (site indexed same day in google, images who knows when). Having the name of the subject in the image name doesn&#8217;t necessarily give good results either.</p>
<p>A search for sanchis brought up an image labelled s2.jpg.</p>
<p>Confusing. If you have more recent intelligence on how to optimise for google images, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
