<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Won&#8217;t Allow 3rd-Party Apps on the iPhone Because AT&amp;T Fears VoIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-69581</link>
		<dc:creator>Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-69581</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple Wonâ€™t Allow 3rd-Party Apps on the iPhone Because AT&amp;T Fears VoIP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Wonâ€™t Allow 3rd-Party Apps on the iPhone Because AT&#38;T Fears VoIP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-43442</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-43442</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying anything at all about a land-line.  This is completely about mobile service.  AT&amp;T&#039;s entire way to make money here is off of selling you packages of voice minutes for your mobile..  The more you talk, the larger a package you need.  There&#039;s no other way for them in this agreement to make money, except of course when you exceed the package you guessed fit your needs and end up with a crazy overage charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying anything at all about a land-line.  This is completely about mobile service.  AT&#038;T&#8217;s entire way to make money here is off of selling you packages of voice minutes for your mobile..  The more you talk, the larger a package you need.  There&#8217;s no other way for them in this agreement to make money, except of course when you exceed the package you guessed fit your needs and end up with a crazy overage charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbd</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-43441</link>
		<dc:creator>nbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-43441</guid>
		<description>Hardly. . . AT&amp;T&#039;s first concern is wireless and putting a wireless device in your hands. Next to sell you internet service, then video. The last thing would be to sell you their land-line phone service. That&#039;s why uVerse, the new TV offering via fiber, is VOIP based. Traditional pots is old-school. I think your analysis is way off base and does not reflect the product power that Apple has. . . I don&#039;t believe AT&amp;T is behind this non-sdk sdk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly. . . AT&amp;T&#8217;s first concern is wireless and putting a wireless device in your hands. Next to sell you internet service, then video. The last thing would be to sell you their land-line phone service. That&#8217;s why uVerse, the new TV offering via fiber, is VOIP based. Traditional pots is old-school. I think your analysis is way off base and does not reflect the product power that Apple has. . . I don&#8217;t believe AT&amp;T is behind this non-sdk sdk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Macalope &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s all AT&#38;T&#8217;s fault</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-43416</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macalope &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s all AT&#38;T&#8217;s fault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-43416</guid>
		<description>[...] Christian Gloddy thinks he knows why Apple won&#8217;t be releasing an iPhone SDK &#8212; AT&amp;T doesn&#8217;t want VoIP apps on the iPhone because it doesn&#8217;t want users to have an alternative to buying its overpriced talk minutes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christian Gloddy thinks he knows why Apple won&#8217;t be releasing an iPhone SDK &#8212; AT&#38;T doesn&#8217;t want VoIP apps on the iPhone because it doesn&#8217;t want users to have an alternative to buying its overpriced talk minutes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
