<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Won&#8217;t Allow 3rd-Party Apps on the iPhone Because AT&#038;T Fears VoIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-69581</link>
		<dc:creator>Feed Search Engine - All Fresh Articles And News Are Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-69581</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple Wonâ€™t Allow 3rd-Party Apps on the iPhone Because AT&#38;T Fears VoIP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Wonâ€™t Allow 3rd-Party Apps on the iPhone Because AT&#38;T Fears VoIP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-43442</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-43442</guid>
		<description>I'm not saying anything at all about a land-line.  This is completely about mobile service.  AT&#038;T's entire way to make money here is off of selling you packages of voice minutes for your mobile..  The more you talk, the larger a package you need.  There's no other way for them in this agreement to make money, except of course when you exceed the package you guessed fit your needs and end up with a crazy overage charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying anything at all about a land-line.  This is completely about mobile service.  AT&#038;T&#8217;s entire way to make money here is off of selling you packages of voice minutes for your mobile..  The more you talk, the larger a package you need.  There&#8217;s no other way for them in this agreement to make money, except of course when you exceed the package you guessed fit your needs and end up with a crazy overage charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbd</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-43441</link>
		<dc:creator>nbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-43441</guid>
		<description>Hardly. . . AT&#38;T's first concern is wireless and putting a wireless device in your hands. Next to sell you internet service, then video. The last thing would be to sell you their land-line phone service. That's why uVerse, the new TV offering via fiber, is VOIP based. Traditional pots is old-school. I think your analysis is way off base and does not reflect the product power that Apple has. . . I don't believe AT&#38;T is behind this non-sdk sdk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly. . . AT&amp;T&#8217;s first concern is wireless and putting a wireless device in your hands. Next to sell you internet service, then video. The last thing would be to sell you their land-line phone service. That&#8217;s why uVerse, the new TV offering via fiber, is VOIP based. Traditional pots is old-school. I think your analysis is way off base and does not reflect the product power that Apple has. . . I don&#8217;t believe AT&amp;T is behind this non-sdk sdk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Macalope &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s all AT&#38;T&#8217;s fault</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/3rd-party-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-43416</link>
		<dc:creator>The Macalope &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s all AT&#38;T&#8217;s fault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/apple-wont-allow-3rd-party-apps-on-the-iphone-because-att-fears-voip/#comment-43416</guid>
		<description>[...] Christian Gloddy thinks he knows why Apple won&#8217;t be releasing an iPhone SDK &#8212; AT&#38;T doesn&#8217;t want VoIP apps on the iPhone because it doesn&#8217;t want users to have an alternative to buying its overpriced talk minutes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christian Gloddy thinks he knows why Apple won&#8217;t be releasing an iPhone SDK &#8212; AT&#38;T doesn&#8217;t want VoIP apps on the iPhone because it doesn&#8217;t want users to have an alternative to buying its overpriced talk minutes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
