<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Reports Rates the Dyson DC14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-83566</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-83566</guid>
		<description>I own a Dyson Dc14 It is a terrible vacuum it does not pick up like they say I have had it in the shop four times Ive called dyson and the pretty much tell me im lying. but if there is a piece of confetti on the floor and I have to go over it ten times just for it to drop it some where else. it sucks the big one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a Dyson Dc14 It is a terrible vacuum it does not pick up like they say I have had it in the shop four times Ive called dyson and the pretty much tell me im lying. but if there is a piece of confetti on the floor and I have to go over it ten times just for it to drop it some where else. it sucks the big one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-81097</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-81097</guid>
		<description>Biggest misunderstanding!!

A Dyson uses cyclonic cleaning and with any vacuum that has cyclonic technology the dirt spins and settles in the dirt bin. The dirt is not "packed down" like it is in bagged vacuums and some other bagless models. Cyclonic cleaning allows a lot of air in the dirt and it fluffs up...

The result is yes it looks like you are picking up soooo much more dirt than you really are vs a bag. You can fill a Dyson bin up with dirt 3-4 times and that same amount of dirt will only require one bag in most models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biggest misunderstanding!!</p>
<p>A Dyson uses cyclonic cleaning and with any vacuum that has cyclonic technology the dirt spins and settles in the dirt bin. The dirt is not &#8220;packed down&#8221; like it is in bagged vacuums and some other bagless models. Cyclonic cleaning allows a lot of air in the dirt and it fluffs up&#8230;</p>
<p>The result is yes it looks like you are picking up soooo much more dirt than you really are vs a bag. You can fill a Dyson bin up with dirt 3-4 times and that same amount of dirt will only require one bag in most models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli manning</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-74741</link>
		<dc:creator>eli manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-74741</guid>
		<description>I am excited about playing in the Super Bowl. And my Dyson is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am excited about playing in the Super Bowl. And my Dyson is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-70804</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-70804</guid>
		<description>I own a Dyson dc14 all floors and while it cleans good, I keep getting that loud, annoying ratcheting noise, even though the brush bar is free of human hair.  Also, it's kind of hard to push and if I force it, I get that loud noise, as if the vacuum is resisting my attempt to push it forward.

I read somewhere that the noise is caused by a faulty clutch so if that's the case, I wasted $400 on this vacuum which is only 2 months old and I don't even do a lot of vacuuming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a Dyson dc14 all floors and while it cleans good, I keep getting that loud, annoying ratcheting noise, even though the brush bar is free of human hair.  Also, it&#8217;s kind of hard to push and if I force it, I get that loud noise, as if the vacuum is resisting my attempt to push it forward.</p>
<p>I read somewhere that the noise is caused by a faulty clutch so if that&#8217;s the case, I wasted $400 on this vacuum which is only 2 months old and I don&#8217;t even do a lot of vacuuming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanCnKC</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-65677</link>
		<dc:creator>DanCnKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-65677</guid>
		<description>For those of you who vacuum with your old vacuum and then claim the Dyson picks up after it....please keep in mind one thing.

If you set a Dyson roller down to medium to low setting, the roller grabs a lot of carpet fiber that other vacuum cleaner's don't.  

This is not a good thing, as it breaks down your carpet and is not the same thing as picking up dust and debris.

I purchased the Hoover Mach 5...  which was blueprinted off the first Dyson who's patent expired.   The roller's ability to pick things up is great....   but you have to be careful about that roller breaking down your carpet fibers.

A vacuum should not cut the life of your carpet in half by pulling fibers out...

In the mad rush to find the vacuum that fills the canister fastest, just pay attention to what it is that vacuum is filling it with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who vacuum with your old vacuum and then claim the Dyson picks up after it&#8230;.please keep in mind one thing.</p>
<p>If you set a Dyson roller down to medium to low setting, the roller grabs a lot of carpet fiber that other vacuum cleaner&#8217;s don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>This is not a good thing, as it breaks down your carpet and is not the same thing as picking up dust and debris.</p>
<p>I purchased the Hoover Mach 5&#8230;  which was blueprinted off the first Dyson who&#8217;s patent expired.   The roller&#8217;s ability to pick things up is great&#8230;.   but you have to be careful about that roller breaking down your carpet fibers.</p>
<p>A vacuum should not cut the life of your carpet in half by pulling fibers out&#8230;</p>
<p>In the mad rush to find the vacuum that fills the canister fastest, just pay attention to what it is that vacuum is filling it with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayfoot</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-37460</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-37460</guid>
		<description>It's amazing how staunchly Dyson owners defend their choice, despite quantitative data that there are better models for less money. It reminds me of the Kirby owners in years past, who insisted their overpriced, heavy, and noisy vacuums were the best ever. Visual design and marketing triumph again, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how staunchly Dyson owners defend their choice, despite quantitative data that there are better models for less money. It reminds me of the Kirby owners in years past, who insisted their overpriced, heavy, and noisy vacuums were the best ever. Visual design and marketing triumph again, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Anderson</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-28392</link>
		<dc:creator>T Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-28392</guid>
		<description>Dysons are worth every penny they cost period. I've owned a Kirby previously and it was the 2nd best vacuum I've used. After numerous Bissils and Hoovers I won't buy anything other than Dyson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dysons are worth every penny they cost period. I&#8217;ve owned a Kirby previously and it was the 2nd best vacuum I&#8217;ve used. After numerous Bissils and Hoovers I won&#8217;t buy anything other than Dyson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carlson</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-23234</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-23234</guid>
		<description>Having just bought the 14, a few comments.

If you need HEPA filtration, Dyson is the cheapest by far - why?  No filters to buy - ever.  I have had other HEPA vacums - if you have dogs and cats, you will be spending $20 to $40 bucks on a filter every several months.  The Dyson becomes cheap very quickly.  

Lifespan - most low cost vacums are low life span vacums - basically disposable models.  I have gone through two Hoovers and a Eureka in the past eight years.  The Dyson comes with a 5year warranty.

Third, not everyone needs a quality vacum cleaner.  If you do not have heavy use, or even carpets, you can get buy with way less, and it will last a long time because it is not being used.  If my wife and I did not have kids dogs and cats - the $70 bucks would buy a vacum that would do the job for decades.

Better is only determined based upon what your criteria is.  And my criteria is not CR's - it is far more demanding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just bought the 14, a few comments.</p>
<p>If you need HEPA filtration, Dyson is the cheapest by far - why?  No filters to buy - ever.  I have had other HEPA vacums - if you have dogs and cats, you will be spending $20 to $40 bucks on a filter every several months.  The Dyson becomes cheap very quickly.  </p>
<p>Lifespan - most low cost vacums are low life span vacums - basically disposable models.  I have gone through two Hoovers and a Eureka in the past eight years.  The Dyson comes with a 5year warranty.</p>
<p>Third, not everyone needs a quality vacum cleaner.  If you do not have heavy use, or even carpets, you can get buy with way less, and it will last a long time because it is not being used.  If my wife and I did not have kids dogs and cats - the $70 bucks would buy a vacum that would do the job for decades.</p>
<p>Better is only determined based upon what your criteria is.  And my criteria is not CR&#8217;s - it is far more demanding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvious Diversion &#187; Is the Dyson Vacuum All It&#8217;s Cracked Up to Be?</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-8688</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvious Diversion &#187; Is the Dyson Vacuum All It&#8217;s Cracked Up to Be?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-8688</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Received the February issue and they rated the DC14.     .  Posted December 7th, 2004  Permanent Link   RSS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Received the February issue and they rated the DC14.     .  Posted December 7th, 2004  Permanent Link   RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/dyson-dc14/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=222#comment-691</guid>
		<description>We have a Dyson vacuum cleaner at home and it works far better than any other vacuum cleaner we've previously owned. I would say it was entirely worth it because we've had it for quite a long time and it continues to work beautifully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a Dyson vacuum cleaner at home and it works far better than any other vacuum cleaner we&#8217;ve previously owned. I would say it was entirely worth it because we&#8217;ve had it for quite a long time and it continues to work beautifully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
