Comments on: Is the Failure of Bluetooth a Failure of Windows? http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/failure-of-bluetooth/ Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:43:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3 hourly 1 By: Christian http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/failure-of-bluetooth/comment-page-1/#comment-55481 Christian Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:46:14 +0000 http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=80#comment-55481 You may want to look at the date of this post and the version we're speaking of: Sept 12., 2004 and Bluetooth 1.0. The commentary is specific to the issues that bluetooth 1.0 was seeing on that date. You are likely using version 2.1, which has had the benefit of additional three years. In fact, I state that the industry is looking for other solutions that may be "...something to be labeled Bluetooth 2..." You may want to look at the date of this post and the version we’re speaking of: Sept 12., 2004 and Bluetooth 1.0. The commentary is specific to the issues that bluetooth 1.0 was seeing on that date. You are likely using version 2.1, which has had the benefit of additional three years.

In fact, I state that the industry is looking for other solutions that may be “…something to be labeled Bluetooth 2…”

]]> By: tekno http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/failure-of-bluetooth/comment-page-1/#comment-55473 tekno Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:29:35 +0000 http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=80#comment-55473 failure? in our workplace bluetooth is the connectivity of choice. the use of bluetooth has boosted our productivity by 20%. you've just failed to send contact details and now you are saying that bluetooth has failed?!? failure? in our workplace bluetooth is the connectivity of choice. the use of bluetooth has boosted our productivity by 20%.

you’ve just failed to send contact details and now you are saying that bluetooth has failed?!?

]]> By: Christian http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/failure-of-bluetooth/comment-page-1/#comment-92 Christian Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:37:59 +0000 http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=80#comment-92 In a mobile phone market that now is comprised of over a billion customers, we're going to need much larger Bluetooth numbers to impact the market. I do believe device to device near-range wireless communication will take place, but Bluetooth 1.0 may end up being a footnote in that story. In a mobile phone market that now is comprised of over a billion customers, we’re going to need much larger Bluetooth numbers to impact the market. I do believe device to device near-range wireless communication will take place, but Bluetooth 1.0 may end up being a footnote in that story.

]]> By: sivert http://obviousdiversion.com/technology/failure-of-bluetooth/comment-page-1/#comment-91 sivert Sun, 12 Sep 2004 21:40:01 +0000 http://obviousdiversion.com/?p=80#comment-91 Failiure? In June the factories spat out 2 million bluetooth enabled units per week. The latest report, 3 months later, says 3 million per week. Maybe this year will be THE year after all? Failiure? In June the factories spat out 2 million bluetooth enabled units per week. The latest report, 3 months later, says 3 million per week. Maybe this year will be THE year after all?

]]>